Practice Areas
Utah’s criminal code has a separate statute that prohibits retail theft. Retail theft is commonly called "shoplifting" or "petty theft." The crime of shoplifting can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor depending on the circumstances and the value of the property taken.
Most shoplifting cases involve taking property worth less than $500. If so, then the crime is usually charged as a class B misdemeanor. Crimes for retail theft and shoplifting are usually prosecuted under Utah's Criminal Code Section 76-6-602.
Retail theft and shoplifting cases are one of the few types of crimes committed by women more than men. The charges are serious because even a misdemeanor conviction for a first offense of shoplifting is considered a "crime of dishonesty" or a "crime of moral turpitude."
A conviction for a crime of dishonesty comes with a lifetime of consequences. A conviction for shoplifting can show up in even the most basic of background checks. In many of these cases, the goal is being eligible to expunge the criminal record as quickly as possible.
If you were charged with retail theft or shoplifting under Utah's criminal code Section 76-6-602, then contact an experienced criminal defense attorney at Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat, LLP. With offices conveniently located in Salt Lake City, we are here to help.
Whether this is your first offense, or a second or subsequent arrest for theft, our attorneys work hard to protect you at every stage of the case as we fight for the best possible outcome. Let us put our experience to work for you.
Call (801) 532-5297 today to speak with an attorney about your case.
Utah Retail Theft / Shoplifting Information Center
Back to top
An act of shoplifting or retain theft committed is punished under Subsection 76-6-412(1).
(1) Theft of property and services as provided in this chapter is punishable:
(a) as a second degree felony if the:
(i) the value of the property or services is or exceeds $5,000;
(ii) property stolen is a firearm or an operable motor vehicle;
(iii) the actor is armed with a dangerous weapon, as defined in Section 76-1-601, at the time of the theft; or
(iv) property is stolen from the person of another;
(b) as a third degree felony if:
(i) the value of the property or services is or exceeds $1,500 but is less than $5,000;
(ii) the actor has been twice before convicted of any of the offenses listed in Subsections (1)(b)(ii)(A) through (1)(b)(ii)(C), if each prior offense was committed within 10 years of the date of the current conviction or the date of the offense upon which the current conviction is based and at least one of those convictions is for a class A misdemeanor:
(A) any theft, any robbery, or any burglary with intent to commit theft;
(B) any offense under Title 76, Chapter 6, Part 5, Fraud; or (C) any attempt to commit any offense under Subsection (1)(b)(ii)(A) or (B);
(iii) in a case not amounting to a second degree felony, the property taken is a stallion, mare, colt, gelding, cow, heifer, steer, ox, bull, calf, sheep, goat, mule, jack, jenny, swine, poultry, or a fur-bearing animal raised for commercial purposes; or
(iv)
(A) the value of property or services is or exceeds $500 but is less than $1,500;
(B) the theft occurs on a property where the offender has committed any theft within the past five years; and
(C) the offender has received written notice from the merchant prohibiting the offender from entering the property pursuant to Section 78B-3-108;
(v) the actor has been twice before convicted of any of the offenses listed in Subsections (1)(b)(ii)(A) through (1)(b)(ii)(C), if each prior offense was committed within 10 years of the date of the current conviction or the date of the offense upon which the current conviction is based and the value of the property stolen is or exceeds $500 but is less than $1,500; or
(vi) the actor has been previously convicted of a felony violation of any of the offenses listed in Subsections (1)(b)(ii)(A) through (1)(b)(ii)(C); (c) as a class A misdemeanor if:
(i) the value of the property stolen is or exceeds $500 but is less than $1,500;
(ii)
(A) the value of property or services is less than $500;
(B) the theft occurs on a property where the offender has committed any theft within the past five years; and
(C) the offender has received written notice from the merchant prohibiting the offender from entering the property pursuant to Section 78B-3-108; or
(v) the actor has been twice before convicted of any of the offenses listed in Subsections (1)(b)(ii)(A) through (1)(b)(ii)(C), if each prior offense was committed within 10 years of the date of the current conviction or the date of the offense upon which the current conviction is based, and the value of the property stolen is or exceeds $500 but is less than $1,500; or
(vi) the actor has been previously convicted of a felony violation of any of the offenses listed in Subsections (1)(b)(ii)(A) through (1)(b)(ii)(C);
(c) as a class A misdemeanor if:
(i) the value of the property stolen is or exceeds $500 but is less than $1,500;
(ii)
(A) the value of property or services is less than $500;
(B) the theft occurs on a property where the offender has committed any theft within the past five years; and
(C) the offender has received written notice from the merchant prohibiting the offender from entering the property pursuant to Section 78B-3-108; or
(iii) the actor has been twice before convicted of any of the offenses listed in Subsections (1)(b)(ii)(A) through (1)(b)(ii)(C), if each prior offense was committed within 10 years of the date of the current conviction or the date of the offense upon which the current conviction is based; or
(d) as a class B misdemeanor if the value of the property stolen is less than $500 and the theft is not an offense under Subsection (1)(c).
Furthermore, if a person violates Subsection 76-6-408(1) or Section 76-6-413, or commits theft of property described in Subsection 76-6-412(1)(b)(iii), then the person is civilly liable for three times the amount of actual damages, if any sustained by the plaintiff, and for costs of suit and reasonable attorney fees.
Back to top
Utah’s criminal code Section 76-6-601 defines the several different terms that apply throughout the retail theft statutory scheme including:
Back to top
Utah’s criminal code, section 76-6-602, sets out the elements of retail theft as follows:
Back to top
If a merchant has probable cause to believe that a person has committed retail theft, the merchant may detain such person, on or off the premises of a retail mercantile establishment, in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable length of time for all or any of the following purposes:
(a) to make reasonable inquiry as to whether such person has in his possession unpurchased merchandise and to make a reasonable investigation of the ownership of such merchandise;
(b) to request identification;
(c) to verify such identification;
(d) to make a reasonable request of such person to place or keep in full view any merchandise such individual may have removed, or which the merchant has reason to believe he may have removed, from its place of display or elsewhere, whether for examination, purchase, or for any other reasonable purpose; (e) to inform a peace officer of the detention of the person and surrender that person to the custody of a peace officer;
(f) in the case of a minor, to inform a peace officer, the parents, guardian, or other private person interested in the welfare of that minor immediately, if possible, of this detention and to surrender custody of such minor to such person.
If the detention occurs off the premises of the retail mercantile establishment, the detention must be after an immediate pursuit of such person.
Utah section 76-6-604 provides a defense for a merchant who detains a person after finding probable cause to believe the person committed retail theft and the merchant acted reasonably under the circumstances. The defense applies to a civil lawsuit is brought by any person detained who brings a lawsuit for any of the following:
Back to top
Additional Resources
Statutes for Retail Theft in Utah - Visit the website of the Utah State Legislature to find the statutory language for retail theft and other offenses against property in Part 6. Find the definitions, acts constituting retail theft, special protections for merchants who detain suspected shoplifters, penalties for shoplifting, and penalties for removing theft detection shielding devices.
Back to top
If you were charged with retail theft or shoplifting in Salt Lake City or the surrounding areas in Utah, then contact an experienced criminal defense attorney to discuss your case.
Find out what you need to do right now to protect yourself against a false or exaggerated accusation. We also represent clients charged with removing theft detection devices or using detection shielding services.
Let us put our experience to work for you. Call (801) 532-5297 today to speak with an attorney at Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat, LLP experienced in defending theft crimes in Utah.
Back to top
Use the form above to request your free, confidential case evaluation. Our office will contact you as soon as possible to arrange for you to discuss the facts of your case with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Note: By submitting the above form, you are requesting a free and confidential consultation with one of our attorneys to discuss the specific facts of your case. We will evaluate your unique situation and provide you with valuable information about how an attorney may be able to help you. Please do not provide any confidential or time-sensitive information using this online contact form. If your situation is urgent, please call us at (801) 532-5297. We look forward to hearing from you.
The use of this form for communication with our personnel does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Mark has represented our son for over ten years. We have a difficult situation but we have never doubted that Mark, and now, Mike, care about him and our family. Their caring advice has been a lifeline for us.
Mike Holje was there for me and helped me get the charges dismissed. He was fantastic. I am so thankful for this firm.
Jim Bradshaw worked with me on a case and was helpful, realistic and very professional. I found him to be one of the best attorneys (and person) I have encountered.
I used Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat and would recommend them to anyone. Everyone in his or her office is kind, efficient and very responsive. You are treated respectfully and on an equal playing field.